A link to this dissertation has been added to the Theses and Dissertations page:
Strickland, Phillip David. “Pro Hebraious: The Epistle to the Hebrews and Its Relationship to Second Temple Judaism.” PhD diss., McMaster Divinity College, 2019.
A Resource Blog on the Book of Hebrews
A link to this dissertation has been added to the Theses and Dissertations page:
Strickland, Phillip David. “Pro Hebraious: The Epistle to the Hebrews and Its Relationship to Second Temple Judaism.” PhD diss., McMaster Divinity College, 2019.
A recent doctoral dissertation that is available on the internet:
Ngama, Dickson Kûng’û. “Rest, Rhetoric, and Suffering in the Letter to the Hebrews: How the Author of Hebrews Uses Classical Rhetoric to Resolve Tension between Invitation to God’s Rest and Present Suffering.” PhD diss., Rawlings School of Divinity, 2024.
HT: Lee Zachary Maxey
Elena Belenkaja. Die Komplementarität räumlicher und zeitlicher Aspekte in der Eschatologie des Hebräerbriefes. (Rainer Hampp Verlag).
"The
Letter to the Hebrews presents a unique eschatology between space and
time embedded in an artful symbiosis of philosophical and theological
thoughts, with its author developing his very own eschatology within the
New Testament. Its peculiarity is expressed in the interweaving of
perfect, present and future statements. Their interpretation suffers
from the difficulty of grasping the limitations of these statements and
their relationship to each other, a challenge which this book takes up.
In an exegetical case study of the primary text (Heb. 1-13), the author
examines relevant statements on the understanding of time and space,
taking into account their complementary relationship."
Amy Peeler. "The Barriers and Brilliance of Hebrews." Riley Heppner Podcast.
Amy Peeler. "How to Understand Hebrews!" The Center for Bible Study.
Theme: Hebrews and the Pauline Tradition
For
much of Christian history the Epistle to the Hebrews was understood as a
Pauline letter. Today the overwhelming scholarly consensus is that Paul
is not the author of Hebrews. Still the connection to Paul is difficult
for Hebrews to shake. Even if Paul did not write Hebrews, there is some
connection—even if just merited by the epistle’s canonical placement
immediately after Paul’s letters—that is significant. Surprisingly, in
recent decades little scholarly attention has been devoted to
investigating this connection. This research group explores the
relationship between Hebrews and the Pauline tradition. While Hebrews
must be able to speak on its own terms, historical and canonical
imperatives call for it to be read alongside Paul’s letters.
This year we are hosting invited papers that address theological
connections between Hebrews and the Pauline tradition.
Theme: Scripture and Church Seminar (SACS)
Theme: Asian American Biblical Interpretation: Evangelical Voices
Theme: Composing Communities
Theme: Hebrews and Other Early Christian Literature
Madison N. Pierce, Western Theological Seminary, PresidingTheme: Open Session on Hebrews
Madison Pierce, Western Theological Seminary, Presiding
New article:
Clivaz, Claire. “The Minor Variant of Hebrews 2.9, with Mark 15.34 and Psalm 22.2.” New Testament Studies 70 (2024): 291–306.
This article explores the relationship of a minor variant in Hebrews 2.9 – Jesus dead ‘apart from God’ (χωρὶς θɛοῦ) – with the minor variant of Mark 15.34 and more broadly with Psalm 22.2, as suggested by Harnack, Michel, Zuntz, Elliott, Ehrman and Rodgers. First, it highlights new elements in the file of the evidence of Heb 2.9 and compares it with the case of Mark 15.34. Secondly, it demonstrates that paying attention to the minor variants of Heb 2.9 and Mark 15.34 allows one to grasp better the diversity of Jewish and early Christian readings of Ps 22.2 or Ps 21.2 LXX: these readings provide a plausible context to explain the emergence of these two minor variants.