Nick Brennan informed me that his Ph.D. dissertation has been accepted at the University of Otago in New Zealand. Here is the pertinent information and abstract:
Thesis title: The Son as God: the Theological Salience of
Divine Christology in the Epistle to the Hebrews
Primary supervisor: Paul Trebilco
Examiners: Harold Attridge, Craig Koester, Gareth
Cockerill
Abstract:
This thesis investigates the divinity of the Son in the
Epistle to Hebrews. In spite of a burgeoning interest in divine Christology in
NT studies, the Son’s divinity in Hebrews has received little specific
attention, being variously assumed, questioned, or treated as largely
unnecessary in recent scholarship. Against this backdrop, I explore the
portrayal of Christ’s divinity within the Epistle, and seek to demonstrate that
the theme is, at once, present, pervasive and theologically salient.
In
the Introduction I survey the state of contemporary scholarship on the Son’s
divinity in Hebrews, and discuss issues connected to predicating divinity of
the Son in the Letter. From there I move to three chapters which explore
controverted texts in Hebrews and their contribution to the Son’s depiction as
divine, via the exercising of divine prerogatives.
In
Chapter 2, I focus on the application of OT texts to the Son which, in their
original context, refer to God (1:6; 10–12), and seek to demonstrate how the
Pastor, through them, not only affirms the Son’s divinity but also the
soteriological significance of his exaltation as God.
In
Chapter 3, I discuss how Heb 3:3, 4 has been dismantled as a proof-text for the
Son’s divinity. I argue that the text
does witness to the divinity of the Son in Hebrews, identifying him as the God
who builds the final house of His people, exercising a power that belongs
solely to the Creator.
In
Chapter 4 I survey debate on the relation of the Son’s “indestructible life”
(Heb 7:16) to his divinity. I argue that, though both divinity and humanity are
active in the text, the Son’s divine nature is foundational to the
“indestructible life” which qualifies him for High Priestly ministry.
Chapters
5 and 6 are more synthetic, demonstrating how two concepts in Hebrews reinforce
the Son’s divinity. Chapter 5 explores the largely neglected connection of the
Son’s divinity to the concept of covenant, arguing that the Son’s action as New
Covenant surety is the properly divine fulfilment of God’s self-binding oaths
to Abraham. Chapter 6 seeks to explore Christ’s Sonship, tensions around which
have problematised the Son’s divinity in Hebrews. I argue that the Son’s
identity as son has pre-temporal origins that depict him as divine, and yet
displays itself through two other sonships, human and Davidic. I suggest that
it is within this framework that appeal to the Son as God’s radiance (1:3), or
as “God” (1:8), make most sense, and that, though the descriptions may
secondarily involve his humanity, they portray a Son who is divine.
The
conclusion of the thesis is that, in spite of questions which have been raised,
and the relative neglect of the theme in recent Hebrews scholarship, the
Epistle serves as a rich witness to the identity of the Son as God. Moreover,
this witness is not limited to brief portions of the Letter, but is a pervasive
aspect of its thought, and is indeed theologically salient to the reading of
the Epistle as a whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment