Some of the Hebrews highlights for June 2015:
I respond to Felix Cortez's review of my book on the RBL blog.
Paul Barnett speaks about The Hugenot Heart, basing his talk upon Hebrews 9:26.
Matthew Malcolm gives a synopsis of his chapter in All That the Prophets Have Declared on Scripture and the Trinity in Hebrews. (Matthew has kindly sent along a copy to me, which I will be reviewing soon).
Anthony Billington has a meditation on Hebrews 2:6–9: But We Do See Jesus.
Tom Schreiner has a brief video on Hebrews 1:1–2.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
New Books Added
I have added almost a dozen new book links, including my own monograph, to the partial books page.
The Book of Hebrews in Eight Minutes
The Bible Project has a very nice brief video explaining the meaning of the Book of Hebrews:
HT: Darrell Pursiful and Ben Witherington
HT: Darrell Pursiful and Ben Witherington
Friday, June 26, 2015
My Review of Bateman, Interpreting the General Letters, Is Now Available
The Review of Biblical Literature has just published my review of Herbert W. Bateman's Interpreting the General Letters: An Exegetical Handbook.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Is Hebrews 5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?
The latest issue of Novum Testamentum has an article on Hebrews:
Guzmán, Ron, and Michael W. Martin. “Is Hebrews5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?” Novum Testamentum 57.3 (2015): 295–310.
Abstract from the Brill website:
"This study challenges the view that Heb 5:11-6:20 is a “digression”—a view so widely held as to be a near consensus in scholarship today, and a view that renders the controversial materials of chapter six tangential to the central purposes of the speech. The study gives consideration to ancient rhetorical theory concerning digressio, surveying the major handbooks that discuss the figure. On the basis of this survey, the study argues that only Heb 5:11-14 displays the essential characteristics of digressio. Moreover, in its position and function, this digressio actually points to the controversial materials of chapter six as central to the speech’s cause."
Guzmán, Ron, and Michael W. Martin. “Is Hebrews5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?” Novum Testamentum 57.3 (2015): 295–310.
Abstract from the Brill website:
"This study challenges the view that Heb 5:11-6:20 is a “digression”—a view so widely held as to be a near consensus in scholarship today, and a view that renders the controversial materials of chapter six tangential to the central purposes of the speech. The study gives consideration to ancient rhetorical theory concerning digressio, surveying the major handbooks that discuss the figure. On the basis of this survey, the study argues that only Heb 5:11-14 displays the essential characteristics of digressio. Moreover, in its position and function, this digressio actually points to the controversial materials of chapter six as central to the speech’s cause."
New Book Received
Thanks to Chris Cowan with B & H Publishing Group for a copy of Thomas Schreiner's new commentary on Hebrews. It's in the queue for review.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Jesus in the Letter to the Hebrews
Here is my rough translation of the table of contents of Jordi Cervera's new book:
Jesus in the Letter
to the Hebrews:
A Christology from a
Jewish Matrix
Table of Contents
Presentation
Introduction
First Part
The Hebrews
First Chapter
THE HEBREWS: BELIEVERS IN JESUS FROM A JEWISH MATRIX
1. Judeo-Christian: an
imprecise term
2. Kaleidoscope of
believers from a Jewish and Gentile matrix according to the Second Testament
2.1. Believers from a Jewish provenance
2.1.1. Hebrews observant of the Torah
who required it for Gentile brothers
2.1.2. Hebrews observant of the Torah
who did not require it for Gentile brothers
2.1.3. Hebrews flexible with the Torah who
dismissed it for the Gentiles
2.1.4. Hebrews observant of the Torah
who followed Jesus secretly
2.1.5. Conclusion
2.2. Believers from a Gentile provenance
2.2.1. Gentiles who rejected the Torah
and rejected the Jewish tradition
2.2.2. Gentiles who respected the Torah
despite not observing it
2.2.3. Judaized Gentiles
2.2.4. Conclusion
2.3. The antichrists
2.3.1. Syncretistic or Gnosticized believers
who denied the humanity of Jesus
2.3.2. Messianic believers who did not
accept the divine filiation of Jesus
2.3.3. Conclusion
3. From kaleidoscope to
binoculars
Second Chapter
The Hebrews: Historical Panorama
1. The New Testament
testimony
2. The apocryphal
writings
2.1. Apocrypha of the first testament
2.2. Apocrypha of the second testament
3. The apostolic writings
4. References from the
fathers of the Church
4.1. Justin (150–160 AD)
4.2. Polycrates of Ephesus (ca. 195 AD)
concerning the quartodecimans
4.3. Origen (ca. 185– ca. 253 AD)
4.4. Epiphanius of Salamis (ca. 315–403 AD)
concerning Joseph of Tiberius
4.5. Jerome (331–420 AD)
5. Groups of Christians
from a Jewish matrix according to the fathers of the Church
5.1. Nazarenes
5.2. Ebionites
5.3. Cerinthians and Elkasites
6. Assessments of
Rabbinic Judaism
6.1. The Christians from a Jewish matrix
according to the Tannaitic sources
6.2. The Christians according to Amoraic
sources
6.3. The Birkat ha-Minim as an
explanatory synthesis
6.4. Conclusion
7. A tradition and a
progressively irrelevant group
Second Part
The Letter to the
Hebrews
Third Chapter
“To the Hebrews”: An author and recpients from a Jewish matrix
1. “To the Hebrews”: A
genuine title
1.1. Hebrews in the papyrus Chester Beatty
P46
1.2. Hebrews in the Codex Sinaiticus (אּ)
1.3. Hebrews in the Codex Alexandrinus (A)
1.4. Hebrews in the Codex Vaticanus (B)
1.5. The genuineness of the title “to the
Hebrews”
2. A largely Judaized writing
with later adjustments
2.1. A surprising exordium (Heb 1:1–3)
2.2. The thirteenth chapter
2.3. A postscript of delivery
2.4. Textual dissonances
2.4.1. Hebrews 7:12 and Hebrews
7:18–19a
2.4.2. Hebrews 13:8
2.4.3. Hebrews 13:16
2.5 Internal contradictions
2.5.1. The sacrificial affirmations of
the ninth chapter
2.5.2. Contradictions in the tenth
chapter
2.5.3. Comparative schema
2.6. Adjustments to a largely Judaized
writing
Third Part
Christology of the
Letter to the Hebrews
Fourth Chapter
The christological context of Hebrews
1. The New Testament and
apostolic stamp
1.1. The Johannine writings
1.2. The proto-Pauline writings
1.3. The first letter of Peter
1.4. Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch,
the Martyrdom of Polycarp
2. References from
intertestamental literature
2.1. A priestly messianism at Qumran
2.2. The new priesthood of the Testament of
Levi
2.3. Melchizedek at Qumran
2.4. Melchizedek in the Targums
Fifth Chapter
An inspired apology from the death and heavenliness of Jesus
1. Recipients from a
Jewish matrix with difficulties to confess the communal faith
1.1. Messianic traits of Jesus assumed by
believers of the Jewish matrix
1.1.1. A preexistent Messiah, son, and
session at the right hand
1.1.2. A suffering Messiah who expiates
sins
1.2. Christological depth and novelty
1.2.1. The new covenant in Jesus
1.2.2. A Messiah fully son, celestial
and universal priest
1.3. The christological controversy
1.3.1. Jesus is also God
1.3.2. His blood expiates sins in a
definitive manner
1.4. Difficulties of communion in the
confession of faith
1.5. A postbaptismal catechesis
2. A sacrificed and
exalted Jesus: an expiation and a definitive mediation
2.1.
The relevancy of the great high priest in Hebrews
2.2. Jesus and Melchizedek
2.3. Conclusion
3. A theology of a Jewish
matrix with remarks of a Greek stamp
Sixth Chapter
A symphony of christological titles
1. A rhythmical combination
of christological titles
2. Melodies of priestly
messianism
2.1. High priest/priest and son of God
2.2. Christ, high priest, son
2.3. High priest and son
2.4. Christ and high priest
2.5. Offering and Jesus Christ
3. Priestly melodies
3.1. High priest and sacrifice
3.2. Sacrifice and offering
4. Melodies of priestly
mediation
4.1. Envoy and high priest
4.2. Precursor and high priest
5. Complementary melodies
5.1. Melody of messianic mediator: son and
heir
5.2. Messianic melody: Christ and son
5.3. Melody of mediation: great shepherd
and our Lord
6. Melodies that outline
christological themes
Seventh Chapter
Titles descriptive of the celestial cult of Jesus
1. High priest
2. Priest
3. Minister
4. Sacrifice
5. Offering
6. Conclusion
Eighth Chapter
Titles descriptive of the divine status of Jesus
1. Proclamation of the
divinity of Jesus (Heb 1:3–4)
2. Son of God
3. The son
4. Christ
5. Jesus Christ
6. Conclusion
Ninth Chapter
Titles descriptive of the celestial mediation of Jesus
1. Mediator
2. Our Lord
3. Firstborn
4. Initiator and
culminator
5. Guarantor
6. Conclusion
Tenth Chapter
Jesus, the glue and backbone title
1. Jesus: celestial high
priest and perfect offering
1.1. Celestial high priest
1.2. Perfect offering
2. Jesus: preexistent,
suffering, enthroned, universal messiah
3. Jesus: mediator of the
new covenant and of a new faith in God
3.1. Jesus: author, leader, and forefather
of the new covenant
3.1.1. Author of the new covenant
3.1.2. Leader and forefather of the new
covenant
3.2. Jesus: spokesman of a new faith in God
Fourth Part
Epilogue
Eleventh Chapter
Hebrews: A mystic approach to God and to Jesus
1. An existential ascent
through Jesus
2. Contemplating Jesus
3. Observing Jesus
4. Fixing the eyes on
Jesus
5. Approaching God and
Jesus
6. Entering into the
celestial realm
7. A mystic and communal
journey to heaven
Bibliography used
Index of authors
Index of citations
My First Book in Catalan!
Many thanks to Jordi Cervera for sending me a copy of his book, Jesús en la Carta als Hebreus: Una cristologia de matriu jueva. It is my first book in Catalan!
Monday, June 15, 2015
Ken Schenck's Book Is Out
Ken Schenck has announced that his new book on Revelation, Hebrews, and the General Epistles is now available:
The Early Church: Letters to the Body of Christ
Congratulations, Ken!
The Early Church: Letters to the Body of Christ
Congratulations, Ken!
Friday, June 12, 2015
My Response to Felix Cortez’ Review of My Book
Felix Cortez’ review of my book has recently appeared on the RBL website. In his critique of my book, he says that I failed to uncover the story world of Hebrews. However, it was not my intent to uncover the entire story world of Hebrews except for that part of the story world which was pertinent to revealing the character of Jesus. The story world of Hebrews also “includes the stories of the OT . . . as well as the story of the community to which the author was writing” as I note on page 204 in my book. Ken Schenck has already attempted to uncover the story world behind Hebrews in his popular introduction Understanding the Book of Hebrews: The Story behind the Sermon. Cortez notes that I trace the characterization of Jesus in the argument of Hebrews, not its story world, in chapter 5 of my book. But I do reconstruct part of the story world of Hebrews in chapter 4 of my book.
Cortez takes issue with some of my reconstruction of the chronology of Jesus’ life. At the time I was writing my dissertation I did associate the cleansing of sins and atonement with Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross. Certainly there are those who contend that the cleansing of sins and atonement is not completed until after Jesus enters heaven and offers his blood. This interpretation has certainly come to the fore with the publication of David Moffitt’s monograph Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. I think Hebrews can lend itself to either interpretation and hence this remains a contested issue in Hebrews’ study.
Cortez, I think, wrongly critiques me on his next point: “it is difficult to understand why the submission of the enemies under Jesus—or submission of all things—is included in the list before his appointment as high priest.” He contends that the submission of enemies should be listed after his appointment as high priest. I, in fact, do not believe that the submission of enemies takes place before his appointment as high priest. As I note before compiling the chronology, “a strict chronological framework is impossible since many of the deeds occur simultaneously” (p. 203). It is impossible to narrative simultaneously deeds that take place simultaneously. If two things happen at the same time, one can only describe one thing and then the other. I connect the submission of Jesus’ enemies with Jesus’ enthronement as king, not with his appointment as high priest. Hence, on page 205 I describe all the events associated with his enthronement first, and then I describe the events associated with his high priesthood second. I do say “simultaneously with his enthronement, Jesus was also appointed as high priest” (p. 205). The submission of enemies takes place after Jesus’ enthronement and his appointment as high priest.
Cortez then remarks in the next sentence: “There is, however, the more fundamental question whether this reconstructed story of Jesus is coterminous with the story behind Hebrews or just a part of it.” I take it, then, that Cortez believes that the story of Jesus is coterminous with the story world of Hebrews. I, however, take the story of Jesus as only part of the larger story world that lies behind Hebrews. His suggestion in the penultimate paragraph certainly points to further avenues for exploration.
Cortez takes issue with some of my reconstruction of the chronology of Jesus’ life. At the time I was writing my dissertation I did associate the cleansing of sins and atonement with Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross. Certainly there are those who contend that the cleansing of sins and atonement is not completed until after Jesus enters heaven and offers his blood. This interpretation has certainly come to the fore with the publication of David Moffitt’s monograph Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. I think Hebrews can lend itself to either interpretation and hence this remains a contested issue in Hebrews’ study.
Cortez, I think, wrongly critiques me on his next point: “it is difficult to understand why the submission of the enemies under Jesus—or submission of all things—is included in the list before his appointment as high priest.” He contends that the submission of enemies should be listed after his appointment as high priest. I, in fact, do not believe that the submission of enemies takes place before his appointment as high priest. As I note before compiling the chronology, “a strict chronological framework is impossible since many of the deeds occur simultaneously” (p. 203). It is impossible to narrative simultaneously deeds that take place simultaneously. If two things happen at the same time, one can only describe one thing and then the other. I connect the submission of Jesus’ enemies with Jesus’ enthronement as king, not with his appointment as high priest. Hence, on page 205 I describe all the events associated with his enthronement first, and then I describe the events associated with his high priesthood second. I do say “simultaneously with his enthronement, Jesus was also appointed as high priest” (p. 205). The submission of enemies takes place after Jesus’ enthronement and his appointment as high priest.
Cortez then remarks in the next sentence: “There is, however, the more fundamental question whether this reconstructed story of Jesus is coterminous with the story behind Hebrews or just a part of it.” I take it, then, that Cortez believes that the story of Jesus is coterminous with the story world of Hebrews. I, however, take the story of Jesus as only part of the larger story world that lies behind Hebrews. His suggestion in the penultimate paragraph certainly points to further avenues for exploration.
Johnsson Dissertation Available Online
Steve Cook informed me that the following dissertation is available online:
Johnsson, William George. “Defilement and Purgation in the Book of Hebrews.” Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University, 1973.
As usual, I will add a link to the dissertations and theses page.
Monday, June 1, 2015
Hebrews Articles in La Nouvelle Revue Théologique
I was pleased to discover that the journal La nouvelle revue théologique has a number of their articles available online, including the following articles dealing with Hebrews. I came across some articles I have not discovered before (I don't know how that happened . . .).
Vanhoye, Albert. “Salut universel par le Christ et validité de l’Ancienne Alliance.” La nouvelle revue théologique 116.6 (1994): 815–35.
Grelot, Pierre. “Le ministère chrétien dans sa dimension sacerdotale.” La nouvelle revue théologique 112.2 (1990): 161–82.
Bonnard, P.-E. “La traduction de Hébreux 12, 2:‘C’est en vue de la joie que Jésus endura la croix.’” La nouvelle revue théologique 97.5 (1975): 415–23.
Andriessen, Paul. “La traduction de Hébreux 12, 2: ‘Renonçant à la joie qui lui revenait.’” La nouvelle revue théologique 97.5 (1975): 424–38.
Andriessen, Paul. “Angoisse de la mort dans l’Épître aux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 96.3 (1974): 282–92.
Andriessen, Paul. “L’eucharistie dans l’Épître aux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 94.3 (1972): 269–77.
Vanhoye, Albert. “Le Christ, grand-prêtre selon Héb. 2,17–18.” La nouvelle revue théologique 91.5 (1969): 449–74.
Coppens, J. “Les affinités qumrâniennes de l’épîtreaux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 84.2 (1962): 128–41.
Coppens, J. “Les affinités qumrâniennes de l’épîtreaux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 84.3 (1962): 257–82.
Vanhoye, Albert. “Salut universel par le Christ et validité de l’Ancienne Alliance.” La nouvelle revue théologique 116.6 (1994): 815–35.
Grelot, Pierre. “Le ministère chrétien dans sa dimension sacerdotale.” La nouvelle revue théologique 112.2 (1990): 161–82.
Bonnard, P.-E. “La traduction de Hébreux 12, 2:‘C’est en vue de la joie que Jésus endura la croix.’” La nouvelle revue théologique 97.5 (1975): 415–23.
Andriessen, Paul. “La traduction de Hébreux 12, 2: ‘Renonçant à la joie qui lui revenait.’” La nouvelle revue théologique 97.5 (1975): 424–38.
Andriessen, Paul. “Angoisse de la mort dans l’Épître aux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 96.3 (1974): 282–92.
Andriessen, Paul. “L’eucharistie dans l’Épître aux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 94.3 (1972): 269–77.
Vanhoye, Albert. “Le Christ, grand-prêtre selon Héb. 2,17–18.” La nouvelle revue théologique 91.5 (1969): 449–74.
Coppens, J. “Les affinités qumrâniennes de l’épîtreaux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 84.2 (1962): 128–41.
Coppens, J. “Les affinités qumrâniennes de l’épîtreaux Hébreux.” La nouvelle revue théologique 84.3 (1962): 257–82.
Review of Barnard, The Mysticism of Hebrews
Jody Barnard has informed me that a brief review of his book, The Mysticism of Hebrews, has appeared in La nouvelle revue théologique. The review appears on his blog with his translation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)